 |
South Coast Harbours 1698
report by Edmund Dummer and Thomas Wiltshaw |
|

|
Summary and Conclusion:
|
|
images: click to enlarge |
|
|
|
transcript
|
Observations
upon ye fore
recited Ports
& Rivers
|
These short Notes upon the Eighteen Places before Named
wee humbly think may be taken for their Just Characters,
and distinctions respectiveley, at least they seem so to us,
and craving leave to add a Short review of the whole shall
submit to better Judgement.
|
Of Rye Pemsey
Cookmere Newhaven
Shoreham &
Arundell
Generall reasons
of decay and
improbability of
repair
|
It may be observed that the Havens and Rivers of Rye,
Pemsey, Cookmere, Newhaven, Shoreham & Arundell are
now (whatever they have been) no proper Subjects for
improvement for the Navy, For want of that benefitt all
usefull Ports have Namely a sufficient indraught of the
Sea suitable to the rise of Tydes upon the same Coast that
there (on Springs are) Observ'd to be 19 & 20 ft.
upright, For industry by enclosing Wast on the One hand,
and Nature on the Other, By the plenty of Sullage the Sea
Washes from the higher Shoares and carrys about in Motion
to Lodge again in Places more confin'd and quiet, have by
Degrees not only filled Vast spaces once doubtless possessed
by the Sea wth: firme Ground But have likewise Choaked up
almost ye very passages of the Land Fresh which Naturally
tend to it soe that in these as in the decays of Naturall
things in Generall the Conduits and Channells of their being
are destroyed with themselves and Wee doubt without hopes
of reviving
|
Difference of
the Harbours
about the Isle
of Wight from
those of Sussex
|
The Ports of and about Portsmouth under ye. Shelter of the
Isle of Wight are Observ'd to abound in all ye
Accomodations those others are found to want, and altho'
these Harbours or recesses of Water doe fall short almost a
third of the hight of the Tydes Nature and their
Scituation affords the former, it Ordinarily flowing here but
14 ft. the highest which Abates their force and Weight
in Proportion, nevertheless these Channells are open, deep,
and profitable for all Commerce tho' at the same time also
they have less of the Country Freshes to help them.
|
|
|
Of X Church
Pool Weymouth &
Exmouth their
Originall
imperfections
and incapacity
for Shipping
|
Christ Church, Pool, Weymouth, and Exmouth appear to have
Other but more Originall imperfections than are found in
those of Sussex, those may have been great indraughts in
former times, But these seem never to have been Capable of
it, The Soile of the adjacent Land lyes in another Nature,
and the Tydes at highest seem to be not above 8 foot, and
those Both as remiss and uncertain as the Winds on which
their Motion mightily depends, so that their Agitation is in
no wise Capable of that force and virtue which the Service
of great Shipping call for, besides their Exits are Scituate
in great Bayes which render approaches to them more difficult.
|
Of Dartmouth
Fowey Falmouth
& Helford
how & what
circumstances
they differ from
all ye rest and
our opinion of
them.
|
Dartmouth, Fowey, Falmouth & Helford are places of
resort upon some occasions, And there are some particulars
at Dartmouth improveable for the Services of the Navy, But
in other Circumstances all these seem much more Subject
to Hazards for the intercourse of Shipping than those Places
do that are already in Use upon this Coast of England to
which our Order Confines us, wherefore upon the whole wee
see little good Grounds to recom~end or advise any Expences
or disbursements at any of the Places wee have mentioned
and Surveyed from Dover to the Lands-end, for their being
made usefull for the Navy - and Remain
|
Dated ye 19th.
Novbr. 1698
|
Gentn.
Yor. most humble Servts.
Edmd. Dummer. Thos. Wiltshaw
Jams. Conaway. Willm. Cruft.
|
|
 |
South Coast Harbours 1698
report by Edmund Dummer and Thomas Wiltshaw |
|